The Extensive Use of Financial Ratios by Both Practitioners and Essay

The Extensive Use of Financial Ratios by Both Practitioners and Researchers - Essay Example One of the significant purposes behind utilizing monetary proportions is to think about various firms in a similar industry paying little mind to the size of the associations. For example, Return on Equity (ROE) can be determined by utilizing two factors; productivity or salary of the association and its value in this manner regardless of whether the size of the organizations contrasts a ton yet at the same time these two firms can be contrasted with one another (Gowthorpe, 2006). Subsequently, money related proportions are useful in controlling various elements while contrasting various organizations working in the business and permitting scientists a stage to think about firms which may have not been conceivable without these proportions. Correspondingly, other than controlling the size of the association, budgetary proportions control different components like innovation and expecting that these elements are uniform inside a similar industry. ... he firm is disregarded, as speculators putting resources into a more dangerous firm might want to request better yield on venture subsequently the firm ought to gain more significant yields so as to draw in speculators Therefore this contemplations or constraints of budgetary proportions have raised worries on significant issues that are overlooked by the monetary proportions however in spite of this reality, money related examiners, analysts and specialists have been consistently utilizing budgetary proportions. Focal points AND APPLICATION OF USING FINANCIAL RATIOS There are a few focal points and uses of utilizing budgetary proportions which are as per the following: ENABLES COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT FIRMS Financial proportions are useful in permitting examination between various firms and their exhibition and hence the executives of the firm can take choices thinking about its rivals in the business and in general midpoints in the business (Bodie, Kane, and Marcus, 2004) BENCH MARKING TECHNIQUE Because of monetary proportions, organizations can set their presentation targets and measures against the main firms in the business and as they reach skyward, they can improve their general exhibitions (Heaton, 2002). Monetary RATIOS ENABLE ORGANIZATIONS TO EVALUATE FROM THEIR PAST PERFORMANCES Financial proportions permit associations to think about their past exhibitions against their present execution and thusly they can recognize whether they are going the correct way or not (Correia, Flynn, Uliana, and Wormald, 2007). Money related RATIOS ARE HELPFUL IN IDENTIFY DIFFERENT COSTS AND EXPENSES THAT CAN BE REDUCED With the assistance of monetary proportions, the executives can recognize various expenses and costs of the organization that have expanded in the course of the most recent couple of years or expenses and costs in contrast with their rivals and

Case Studies in Anthropology Essay Example

Contextual investigations in Anthropology Paper In section five of the book â€Å"The Yanamamo: Case Studies in Anthropology† by Napoleon A. Chagnon manages political unions, exchanging and devouring and how it fits into their way of life and practices. Partnerships between towns include easygoing exchanging, common devouring and the trading of ladies. Their capacity exists with the perfect that the more grounded towns should take points of interest of the more fragile towns and this is appeared by taking of the ladies of one town from another. Due to this military danger intervillage union is alluring and towns ought to carry on in a solid manner so exchange coalitions are significant. There are three unmistakable highlights of Yanamano exchanging rehearses. The first is that every thing exchanged must be reimbursed with an alternate sort of thing. Who ever gets the blessing must reimburse his accomplice and this is called no mraiha. Along these lines of giving must be taken care of and is an influence to request a proportional blessing. Second the blessing is typically postponed. The perfect is that one exchange will compel the other and gives individuals from neighboring towns a reason and chance to visit one another. The third is the specialization of the endowments. Every town has at least one particular items to use in exchange. The blowout is a showcase of luxuriousness and is an approach to move the visitors to give a dining experience of equivalent size sometime in the not too distant future and spot. Here and there so much food is offered that the visitor will eat an excessive amount of proceed to regurgitation and afterward come back to eat more. Each dining experience requires another. We will compose a custom paper test on Case Studies in Anthropology explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom exposition test on Case Studies in Anthropology explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom exposition test on Case Studies in Anthropology explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer This is a route for partners to become acquainted with one another during the dry season and throughout the years. Dining experiences are energizing and structure a bond between the towns for quite a long time. Reference: Chagnon, N. A. (1997). The Yanamamo: Case concentrates in human sciences. N. J. : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Potential inquiries for a test: 1. What is the significance of animosity in the Yanamano’s culture? (2-3 page answer) 2. What are the three highlights of exchanging rehearses among the Yanamamo culture? (short exposition) 3. How are Women seen in this culture? (Short article).

You have been recently appointed as Human Resource Managment (HRM) Essay

You have been as of late named as Human Resource Managment (HRM) Director of an organization which has perceived that it has issue with low workforce inspiration - Essay Example Representative inspiration is prompting or motivating force which might act naturally produced or impacted by outside powers, that energizes fulfillment and innate desire towards progress in execution. Profitability is characterized as â€Å"the productive just as the powerful utilization of assets to accomplish outcomes† (Berman et al, 2005: 309). Profitability relies upon the nature of HR, and their degrees of execution. In contemporary associations, there is expanding accentuation on executing elite work works on, thinking about all parts of hierarchical activities. The reason for this paper is to inspect worker inspiration and its effect on hierarchical efficiency; recommend HRM approaches, in view of important speculations, that can be presented in an organization with an issue of low workforce inspiration and poor workforce profitability, for improving both inspiration and efficiency. To underscore the significance of HR the board in inspiration and resulting efficiency, hypotheses have been planned on the substance and procedure persuasive models by different scholars, for example, â€Å"Abraham Maslow, Frederick Herzberg, Douglas McGregor, Victor Vroom, Lyman Porter, and Edward Lawler† (Petrick and Furr, 1995: 10). Prior, the â€Å"content† speculations endeavored to clarify inspiration at work as far as the occasions, objectives, needs and sparks, and â€Å"process† hypotheses were worried about conduct at work coming about because of employees’ decisions; and how various types of occasions, conditions or results propel conduct. In this way, crafted by the scholars Maslow, Herzberg and others underlined administrative worry for representative fulfillment towards inspiration and improvement in execution and profitability (Lashley, 2001: 192). As indicated by the necessities based hypothesis of the procedure of inspiration, it is started by the cognizant or oblivious acknowledgment of unsatisfied

An Analysis Of The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Politics Essay

An Analysis Of The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Politics Essay This paper centers around the contention of Nagorno-Karabakh; the beginnings of the contention, its current state and the conceivable future. All through the paper a few key perspectives and hypotheses of International relations are examined, for example, people groups right to self assurance, the idea of country state and compromise. Right off the bat, the significant speculations of International relations are investigated and an endeavor is made to contrast them with the real world and with show their utilization in reality. Also, a chronicled foundation of the contention is portrayed, trailed by a depiction of the contention from 1988 to 1995 and the harmony talks. Thirdly, an investigation of things to come of NK is inspected, calling attention to potential arrangements and types of compromise. In addition, significant inquiries are separately taken a gander at. For more than ten years NK has been on a way of country state building. NK considers itself to be an autonomous republic, even with absence of worldwide acknowledgment. NK has a populace of 141,000 and a territory that covers 11,458.38â km2. (Official site of the President of NK, http://www.president.nkr.am/en/nkr/statePower/, got to on March 2, 2011). The guide beneath show the circumstance of NK, they show both the NK Autonomous Oblast and the present NK state limits that incorporate the involved regions of Azerbaijan: As this thesis manages the accepted province of Nagorno-Karabakh, it investigations and investigates International Law concerning people groups right to self assurance and the ensuing acknowledgment of their state. Section 1, Article 1, section 2 of the United Nations Charter made in 1945 states that the point of the UN is to: Grow inviting relations among countries dependent on regard for the guideline of equivalent rights and self-assurance of people groups, and to take other proper measures to fortify general harmony. Article 1, section 1, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 states the accompanying: All people groups have the privilege of self-assurance. By righteousness of that correct they openly decide their political status and uninhibitedly seek after their financial, social and social turn of events. (Joined Nations Charter 1945, accessible at: http://www.un.org/aboutun/contract/[accessed March 2 2011]) Besides, the Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-activity Among States as per the Charter of the United Nations of 24th October 1970 announces that: By temperance of the standard of equivalent rights and self-assurance of people groups cherished in the Charter of the United Nations, all people groups have the privilege uninhibitedly to decide, without outside impedance, their political status and to seek after their monetary, social and social turn of events, and each State has the obligation to regard this privilege as per the arrangements of the Charter. (Universal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966, accessible at http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm [accessed walk 2 2011]) The foundation of a sovereign and autonomous State, the free affiliation or reconciliation with a free State or the rise into some other political status uninhibitedly dictated by a people establish methods of executing the privilege of self-assurance by that individuals. (UN General Assembly, Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-activity Among States as per the Charter of the United Nations, 24 October 1970,â available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3dda1f104.htmlâ [accessed March 2 2011] ). These legitimate proclamations show the center comprehension and acknowledgment of the worldwide network with respect to people groups right to self assurance. Despite the fact that some center parts of these revelations can be dubious in their down to earth sense, their general message isn't challenged. By considering these and different revelations, the case for the individuals of NK becomes more clear. Directly, the issue lies with the possibility that NK people groups right to self assurance slams into Azerbaijans right to sway, so what is the arrangement? As per Dr. Otto Luchterhandt, the chief of East European Research Department (University of Hamburg): The privilege to self-assurance isn't just a political rule however a standard of existing universal law. The individuals of Nagorny Karabakh are simply the subject of the correct assurance. The individuals of Nagorny Karabakh can guarantee for the most elevated level satisfaction of the law of self-assurance severance from the province of Azerbaijan in light of the fact that from one viewpoint its limitation to the status of a national minority remains in no sensible connection to its real advantages being developed and security, and then again the proportion of its abuse has arrived at such deplorable extents, that staying in the organization of Azerbaijan has gotten unsuitable and it has declared it will for self-assurance in an undeniable and persuading way. (Luchterhandt, Nagorny Karabakhs Right to State Independence According to International Law, Boston, 1993) To utilize global law in a conversation for the situation for NK, explicit confirmation must be appeared. There is additionally the contention that juridical authenticity of fringes and regional respectability neutralizes the self-assurance rule, anyway this can't be considered on account of Azerbaijan SSR (Soviet Socialist Republic). Right off the bat, it must be expressed that NK was a self-sufficient oblast (a managerial unit) inside the Azerbaijan SSR, and that Azerbaijan SSR was not characterized by state fringes, it was characterized by regulatory outskirts, consequently the Helsinki Agreement Final Act in 1975 concerning regional trustworthiness can't be applied. As Francois Mitterrand stated: Why should the inside authoritative fringes of a state be consequently perceived as worldwide ones? (Zargarian,1999). Besides, on the 31st August 19941 the Azerbaijan SSR affirmed the reclamation of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan that had been made from 1918 to 1920. This statement leaves to scrutinize the lawfulness of the current Azerbaijans fringes, including the domains of NK, regions encompassing NK and Nakhijevan, as none of these were a piece of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan. Furthermore, it is all around archived that in December 1920, Azerbaijan SSR acknowledged the regions of NK and Nakhijevan as having a place with Armenia. These statements were later modified by Stalin, which at the occasions was Commissar of Nationalities. To additionally examine, the estimation of state power of Azerbaijan ought to be evaluated as lower than the significance of sway of a state in an ordinary circumstance, regarding the arrangement of states in the League of Nations, along these lines it is lower than the NK people groups right to self assurance. (Raschhofer, 1960) This thought offers backing to the national right to self-assurance of NKs individuals in right to severance over Azerbaijans state sway. (Luchterhandt, 1993). To finish up, as the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh was established after a choice on state freedom on tenth December 1991, bringing about a 98% acknowledgment, and in concurrence with universal and Soviet law, it ought to at last be recognized as real under worldwide law. In addition, point of reference of Eritrea can be utilized, which demonstrated that self announcement prompts be under the intensity of universal law. NK relationship with different nations, worldwide associations, and settlements, for example, the Geneva Convention, all give power for self-assurance. HISTORY The name Nagorno-Karabakh has a blend of 3 dialects; Nagorno is in Russian importance sloping, and Karabakh is in Turkic and Farsi significance Black Garden. Be that as it may, the Armenians call it Artsakh, as it was one of the regions of Greater Armenia, and it is referenced as right on time as second century BC: the antiquated areas of Artsakh and Utik, arranged between Lake Sevan, waterway Kara and stream Araxes. (Strabo, first century BC.) During the hundreds of years, NK has been basically populated by ethnic Armenians, anyway there were periods in which during successes other ethnic gatherings would settle, for example, Caucasian Tatars, Caucasian Albanians (no association with Albanians in Balkans), Persians and Turkic clans. The ongoing clash with Azerbaijan has released a chronicled actuality discovering war, where the Azeris lay recorded cases to these grounds, and the Armenians invalidate them. The individuals living in NK call attention to the undeniable proof, for example, several remnants, old landmarks, strict structure, chapels and religious communities. (Tchilingirian,1999). As one rancher said with respect to this: This religious community (Monastery of Gandzasar) kept us Armenian, the works on these dividers made us know what our identity is. There is a khachkar (cross-stone), the size of a vehicle, on this mountain; our progenitors put it there to show this is Armenian land (Martakert, 1995). To survey the historical backdrop of Artsakh another exposition can be composed, accordingly to keep in accordance with this thesis, an audit of later history is made. After 1918, when the Georgians, Armenians and Azeris exploited the disorder of the Russian Revolution to build up free states, war broke out among Armenia and Azerbaijan, anyway by 1921 each of the three republic were under the standard of the Red Army. (Swietochowski, 1985) Initially, the Bolsheviks decided NKs issue: The Chairman of the Azerbaijani Revolutionary Committee (Azrevkom), Narimanov pronounced: The administration of Workers and Peasants of Azerbaijan, having heard the updates on the declaration in Armenia for the sake of the guerilla lower class of the Soviet Socialist Republic, salutes the triumph of the brotherly Armenian individuals. From this day forward, the previous fringes among Armenia and Azerbaijan are suspended. Rocky Karabagh, Zangezur, and Nakhichevan are perceived as essential p

Implications of Migration for Pro-poor Agricultural Growth :: essays research papers

contrasts and so forth all of which impact relocation examples and settlement utilisation. Strategies musttherefore be widened to incorporate progressively subjective procedures and contextual investigations. 2. Coordinate movement and driving into PRSPs, CASs, National Plans At present most key arrangement reports identified with provincial turn of events, horticulture and povertyreduction give next to zero consideration to relocation. These ought to be evaluated where conceivable to coordinate movement and driving concerns. There should be a more prominent acknowledgment of thecontribution of present and future versatility to advancement and destitution decrease. 3. Recognize the conditions which animate the profitable utilization of settlements Examples of gainful venture of settlements ought to be concentrated to get where and how this has happened by focusing on: • Labor accessibility and family unit work assignment choices, how sexual orientation jobs and social components impacts these choices and the effects of work consumption on the family and neighborhood economy• The abilities base of vagrants and how/if this has changed through relocation and whatcontribution that has made to creating/improving horticulture or endeavor in the source village• Existing limitations looked by the poor in key rural markets, for example, credit and work and how settlements are utilized in circums tances of diligent obligation made byinterlocked markets – do settlements help the poor in getting away from thesearrangements?• Availability of key regular assets – water and land are likely the mostimportant. Are settlements put resources into purchasing more land and is this utilized for creation soon, later or never? Does the accessibility of water influence this pattern?The data from such investigations can be utilized to distinguish fitting integral intercessions The undeniable ones are training and wellbeing – for example progressively taught and more beneficial ranchers are morelikely to spend on better homestead information sources and advancements and so on 4. Distinguish areas/circumstances where it would bode well to encourage the development of individuals This would should be chosen a made to order premise, say at the locale level all together toaccommodate area explicit authentic, agro-natural factors too paces of urbanization and agrarian turn of events. The Chinese model is educational in light of the fact that portability is being urged to diminish country neediness and continue the rustic economy.5. Configuration transport administrations to suit poor transients and workers various research extends on transport directed under by ITDG and through the DFID Knowledge and Research (KaR) ventures have noted vehicle requirements, and their effect on rurallivelihoods and administration arrangement are of a high need for the provincial poor.

Official Transcripts COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

Official Transcripts COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog In order for an admission file to be complete and forwarded to the Admission Committee for review we do require that official transcripts from any college or university attended be mailed to our office. Even if an applicant only took a few classes at a school, we still need official transcripts. Another way to look at it is this: if the college or university is listed on your résumé or on the application, we need official transcripts. For the majority of schools we work with this means that the college or university seals the transcripts in an envelope for delivery to our office. However we work with schools from all over the world and realize that policies vary. The point is that transcripts mailed to our office (we do not accept electronic delivery) must be authentic and official and this can be defined by schools differently. Examples of ways that schools certify transcripts can include: A heat responsive stamp An embossed school stamp Official stickers or ink stamps placed on the transcripts by a university or authorized official A signature of an authorized official across the sealed flap of the envelope Transcripts do not need to be sent directly to our office but if transcripts are sent to you, please do not open them prior to sending them to our office.   There are two circumstances where we can allow for you to open the transcripts and both involve third party translation or authorization. Some schools will only provide one official transcript to a graduate.   In this case we recommend that you hold on to the official copy since we do not return documents submitted to our office.   If your school will only release one copy, take the official copy to a notary public and have them copy the transcripts, authenticate the copy, and seal the copy in an envelope for delivery to our office.   Contact information for the official who copied the transcripts should be included in the envelope. The same would apply for transcripts that need to be translated into English.   If your transcripts are not in English, deliver them to an authorized official for translation and have the translated copy certified and sealed for delivery to our office.   A common organization we recommend for transcript translation is World Education Services. If you participated in an official exchange program and this is noted on the transcripts of your home school, we do not need official transcripts from the exchange school.   However, if there is no official relationship between the home school and exchange school, we need copies from both schools.   The reason for this is that each school may use different codes and grading systems.   These codes and grading systems are typically explained on the reverse side of the transcripts. Finally, if your school does not use a 4.0 grading scale and you are wondering what to put on your admission application, you may input a GPA of 0.0.   The GPA listed on the application is self reported and does not influence your evaluation.   Indicating a score of 0.0 will alert the Committee to pay attention to the scale used by the schools you have attended.

The ontological argument for the existence of God - Free Essay Example

The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument is an a priori argument. The arguments attempt to prove Gods existence from the meaning of the word God. The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion. Anselms classical argument was based on two principals and the two most involved in this is St Anselm of Canterbury as previously mentioned and Rene Descartes. The ontological argument argues that if you understand what it means to talk about God, you will see His existence is necessarily true. Anselm defined God as that than which nothing greater can be conceived, hence God must exist. Anselm also believed that evenIf He did not exist, then you could still think of an even greater being (one just like God that you said did not exist, except this one would exist). Existence must be one of Gods attributes because to remove it, you would still be able to fathom a greater God (one which does exist). The problem most have with this argument is that it seems to simply list existence among Gods attributes, rather than show it. The argument appears to say whatever you can imagine should be true in reality. Descartes claimed God exists is true, if we know what it means to talk of God. Similarly, he maintained that once we know what a triangle is we know that it must have three sides. Like a triangle inherently must have three sides, so God inherently must exist. Objections to the ontological argument were first brought up by a monk who was a contemporary of Anselm named Gaunilo. He said that according to Anselms line of reasoning, if he envisioned an island that is beautiful and sparkling and completely perfect, then it must exist. For an island that does exist would be more perfect than one that does not exist. Gaunilo said that we cannot simply define things into existence. We cannot show an island or God exists simply by analyzing that idea. The Ontological Argument, the Greek word ontology relating to being, for the existence of God uses A Priori logic and reason, based on premises that are not drawn from or dependent upon experience, to state that God must exist because he is the greatest possible being we can conceive. The Ontological Argument is also deduct ive and analytic as the premises of a deductive argument contain the conclusion that it reaches and is structured so that its conclusion is the only possible one that could be deduced from its premises. As it is analytic it is true by definition alone and therefore this argument reaches conclusions about the existence of God based on the definitions of God used in its previous premises. The basis of the ontological argument was first proposed by Anselm and later interpreted by many other philosophers such as Renà © Descartes and Norman Malcolm; however each argument only differed because each started with a different concept of God. The Ontological Argument has faced many critics that challenge the argument for not proving the existence of God and each critic highlights the flaws within this argument explaining that these flaws lead to impossible conclusions. Anselm, an Archbishop, was the first to propose the Ontological argument which was included in the second and third chapters of his book proslogion, a book written as a prayer and/or meditation to reflect on the attributes of God and not originally to prove the existence of a God. Anselm has 2 main arguments, his first defining god as that than which no greater can be conceive. By this Anselm suggests that the greatest possible being must have an existence in reality as a being that exists in reality is greate r than a being that exists in the mind, and surely that-than-which-no-greater-can-be-thought cannot exist in the mind alone. For if it exists solely in the mind, it can be thought to exist in reality also, which is greater. If a being only exists in our mind then a greater being that exists in both our mind and reality can be conceived, therefore the being that than which no greater can be conceived must exist and Anselm concludes that this being is God. Anselms second argument claims that God is eternal, unlimited, by or in time and therefore has necessary existence and is a necessary being. Anselm argues that it is better to be a necessary being than a contingent being, a being that depends on other things for its existence i.e. having a cause/end because this would ultimately limit your power. He explains that God must be a necessary being because if God exists as a contingent being we could imagine greater, therefore God would not be that than which no greater can be conceived. A being which cannot be conceived not to exist must be greater than one that can be conceived not to exist. Anselm then explai ns it would be a self contradiction to claim God does not exist because he is that than which no greater can be conceived and therefore there must be a being that so truly exists it cannot even be conceived not to exist, this form or argument being called reductio ad absurdum. Reductio ad absurdum is a method of reasoning used by Anselm in the Proslogion which aims to demonstrate the truth of something by reducing to absurdity the opposite of what is being proved, Anselm uses this method to reduce to absurdity the opposite of his conclusion, this being that God does not exist. He aims to show this is absurd by means of an argument which shows that the existence of God is logically necessary, and he cannot not exist. Renà © Descartes composed many different Ontological arguments developing them from Anselms original argument. Descartes puts forward the first premise that God is a supremely perfect being and has all perfections, his second premise is then existence is perfection and finally he concludes that God is a supremely perfect being and therefore must exist. This means that Descartes believes God to be a supremely perfect being holding all the perfections and explains if the notion of God did not include existence it would not be supremely perfect a s it would be lacking a perfection and therefore he argues that this would be unintelligible and according to his nature God must exist. Descartes argues that Gods existence can be deduced from his nature, as can geometric ideas can be deduced from shapes and he uses the example of a triangle to support this. The example of the triangle is to show that Descartes believes you cannot deny the existence of God any more than you can the angles of a triangle equalling two right angles as it is an analytic statement. A statement is analytically true if the clauses or predicates within the statement say something necessarily true of all instances of the subject and Descartes maintained existence belonged analytically to God as three angles were analytically predicated of a triangle. The Ontological argument also faces many criticisms by different philosophers for not proving the existence of God. Gaunilo was one of the first philosophers to criticize Anselms theory using his island theory. Gaunilo asked people to conceive an island more excellent than any other island and he suggest that this island according to Anselms proof must necessarily exist because an island which exists in reality would be much greater than one purely in our minds. Although Gaunilos argument does not directly highlight a flaw it does however show the same logic of Anselms argument can be applied to other non-accepted arguments. Anselm responded to this by explaining that only arguments of necessary existence can be applie d to the that than which no greater can be conceived theory and the island theory is a contingent object and therefore can always be improved therefore never reaching a state of perfection. Anselm then dismissed any criticisms that did not relate to a necessary existence. Gaunilo went on to further criticize Anselms argument by putting forward the concept that the notion of God cannot be conceived, he goes onto explain that atheists would not accept that God can be fully understood or grasped and therefore humans cannot fully conceive God. Thomas Aquinas also had this criticism suggesting that people do not know the nature of God and therefore cannot conceive, Aquinas adds the ontological argument would only be useful to someone who understands the essence of God and he does not believe any human is capable of such great understanding. Kants main criticism against the Ontological argument is that he, unlike Anselm and Descartes, does not see existence as a real predicate, Being is obviously not a real predicate. He explains that existing is no perfection, like Descartes has previously stated, because it cannot be listed in a description of anything and explains it cannot be a real predicate because existence does not add to the essence of a being. Kant questions the concept of a necessary being, he considers the example given by Descartes using the necessary proposition of a triangle having 3 angles and rejects the transfer of this logic used on the existence of God, He argues that such necessary propositions are only true if such being exists. Kant also proposes that the statement God exists must either be an analytic or synthetic statement explaining the predicate must either be inside or outside the statement. He argues that for the statement to be analytical like the argument takes it to be it can only be true because of the meaning given to the words, however if the statement is synthetic the argument would not work because the existence of God is not contained in the definition of God. David Hume also went on to criticize Anselms argument by arguing the argument was a failure because it made false assumptions about existence by saying existence was a logical concept. Hume argued existence could only ever be contingent and all statements about existence could be denied easily without contradiction. He also criticized the argument stating that humans have no clear experience of Gods existence and therefore cannot conclude Gods existence through conceiving. In my own opinion I dont believe the Ontological argument proves the existence of God. Atheists looking at this argument would struggle to understand how this proves Gods existence because a lot of Anselm and Descartes argument relies o n the assumption that God exists, and an atheist would not have this believe. The ontological argument is also an A priori argument using no evidence for concrete support and therefore relying on logic alone, this contributes to the difficulty of atheists understand how it could be true because they do not have the assumption about a God. The argument proposes the existence is entailed in the concept of God but many people argue that conceiving God is not possible and therefore his existence to cannot be possible. God exists is argued to be an analytical statement because its predicate is contained within the subject, however critics argue that being and existence is not a real predicate and therefore this statement could be a synthetic statement relying on empirical evidence for Gods existence, this relies on there being empirical evidence for the existence of God which many people including me believe that there isnt. I do not believe the Ontological argument provides the information for an atheist to understand or believe that God exists. Overall the Ontological Argument for the existence of God is both supported and criticised by many philosophers. That than which no greater can be conceived is a statement that is interpreted different by many different philosophers and many different people. Many people believe t his shows that God is a supremely perfect being and must exist whilst others will fail to understand how God can be conceived by humans because they cannot comprehend a being like God and how this would evidently lead to his existence. I believe that it isnt possible to prove the existence of God from the concept of God alone because I fail to see how something so advanced can be conceived by humans without any experience of God. The ontological argument provides different theories for the existence of God each with their strengths and weaknesses however to conclude I do not believe that the Ontological argument would convince an Atheist to believe in the existence of God because that than which no greater can be conceived may be true for some believes it is not necessarily true for others. Only if true premises lead to valid conclusions can a deductive argument be said to have fully succeeded, this cannot be said of the Ontological argument as it has flaws and many argue its premises do not lead to its conclusions. For example Anselms second predicate fails to meet the conclusion that God exists.I therefore believe that the criticisms overpower the arguments explained in the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.